Argumentative Essay Topics - Arguing With the South Korean Government

Argumentative Essay Topics - Arguing With the South Korean GovernmentThe South Korean government is being sued by the American Institute in South Korea (AISK) and several of its citizens for their involvement in a propaganda campaign to create the perception that the Japanese were not responsible for the sinking of the country's naval vessel, the Cheonan. The lawsuit says that this propaganda is causing severe psychological harm to its citizens and has become a justification for many self-aggrandizing actions against the country. However, the article you are reading provides an overview of the AISK complaint against the South Korean government, and the problems it presents for many key legal arguments that a group of American AISK members are making.One of the AISK members who have joined the lawsuit on behalf of a group of Korean citizens is Elliot E. Braithwaite, who founded the AISK Action Group to act as a watchdog to make sure the country does not violate international laws, par ticularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). He also served as the founding chairman of the AISK International Business Center, which is headquartered in San Francisco.On March 9, 2020, the AISK told the South Korean government that they had studied the Japanese Justice Ministry's investigations of the sinking of the Japanese fishing boat and determined that there were no damages to the cargo. In addition, they also showed that there were no items missing from the Cheonan that would have caused the collision.The plaintiffs in the case say that the South Korean government was indirectly responsible for the sinking, by failing to prevent it. They argue that the AISK Action Group has been very active in advocating that the South Korean government should join the International Court of Justice, which holds hearings on disputes between nations. According to these claims, South Korea will only join the court if they believe they can win an appeal.On April 8, 202 0, the South Korean government filed an appeal with the International Court of Justice. They argued that the court should decide the matter in accordance with UNCLOS. However, the plaintiffs argue that the Japanese, while a sovereign nation, are not entitled to be part of the court because they failed to comply with international law.According to the plaintiffs, there is no guarantee that Japan will abide by the court's rulings in this case. Furthermore, they contend that the argument that the action group's activities had been peaceful and that they were acting in the name of peace and justice is an unfair excuse given to justify their self-aggrandizing actions. Furthermore, the plaintiffs argue that the AISK Action Group's actions caused great damage to the country, and that any action based on this case will be viewed with greater suspicion by South Koreans.The plaintiffs argue that the government and their supporters have tried to divert attention away from their self-serving ac tions and focus on their debate support. However, the motion states that a significant portion of the evidence is irrelevant, irrelevant to the court's decision, and unreliable, rendering the case weak.The suit also states that they cannot fight against themselves or their own interpretation of the facts and need an expert who will make a more thorough analysis. There are so many different legal arguments that can be made on both sides of the issue, that it is best to stay ahead of the curve.